GPU COMPARE RADEON 7870 GTX 950 SOFTWARE
GPU COMPARE RADEON 7870 GTX 950 PS4
GPU COMPARE RADEON 7870 GTX 950 PC

GPU COMPARE RADEON 7870 GTX 950 PS4

So you can't just say 'I think the PS4 is clocked faster' without considering weather the compared desktop cards are overclocked.Īlso, HD 7950 totally does trump the PS4 in gaming so far, not by a MASSIVE margin but it's there but it's also running 1070mhz.The GeForce GTX 970 was a performance-segment graphics card by NVIDIA, launched on September 19th, 2014. Reportedly, the PS4's GPU also runs at 800mhz, which would match the 7850's reference clock speed. I run an HD 7950 in a home theater PC, it's an XFX model, the 7950 has a reference clock speed of 800mhz, XFX however gave if a factory OC of 925mhz and frankly I was able to OC it to 1070mhz without issue. There's also the issue of clock speed in desktop cards. Since the PS4 is slightly custom it sits halfway between HD 78, there's no direct equivalent since AMD basically took a 7870, disabled two cores, (Probably to improve yields) and made something sort of between the two. You'd have to be a lot more specific since there's a whole range of GPUs in the Radeon HD 7XXX range. I have a theory that the PS4's GPU is clocked pretty low, because most of the time when I've seen desktop Pitcairn chips compared to the PS4 the desktop wins. I understand it's like apples and oranges here but OP doesn't seem to need to know the specific technicalities of comparing GPU's across operating systems.Įveryone here is well aware of my post being a very rough approximation of power.Įh, thing is, is that a 750 ti could match the PS4's GPU quite easily. Okay well I believe it is an adequate approximation of graphic quality.

GPU COMPARE RADEON 7870 GTX 950 PC

Haven't any of you wonder how a classic Xbox with a Celeron 733mhz single core CPU and a 'GeForce 3.5 GPU' and only 64GB of ram shared between them could run games that an equivalent PC could have run? That thing was so close to being a PC that Linux was ported to it with minimal effort, but it could outclass PCs because it ran close to metal. It wouldn't work on any PCs that weren't identical in hardware, and I mean IDENTICAL, whole thing, even the chipset and the storage controller.

GPU COMPARE RADEON 7870 GTX 950 SOFTWARE

You could TOTALLY build one PC and then build a game with a near dedicated OS that runs the game super close to metal, but this software and OS would basically ONLY work on that hardware configuration. To be clear however, this doesn't mean you theoretically could not do this on a PC. DX12 runs closer to metal but this also increases the burden on developers to ensure all hardware combinations operate correctly. This is even how DX12 works and gains it's advantages. When every console is nearly identical and even hardware revisions are only minor changes, you can get a good margin more power out of a console than a PC with equivalent hardware. Consoles on the other hand have extremely efficient operating systems that run much, much, much closer to metal. PCs are actually REALLY in efficient due to their usage of a general purpose operating system that utilizes a whole slew of abstraction between software and hardware to ensure that that software can correctly interact with literally millions of different possible hardware combinations.

Console performance and PC performance is not NEARLY 1:1. You actually CAN'T make this comparison and people need to stop thinking it. Won't be a perfect comparison, but a good approximation. Going off of this you can do a comparison ' The PS4 GPU is codenamed Pitcairn and is basically a cut down variant of the Radeon 7870 '

Gpu compare radeon 7870 gtx 950